pierre poilievre

Canada First vs Canada Strong

Canada First vs Canada Strong: The Branding Battle Between Mark Carney and Pierre Poilievre for Canada’s Future

With the 2025 federal election fast approaching, the battle for the Prime Minister’s office is already being framed by two strikingly different political brands. Mark Carney, the newly chosen leader of the Liberal Party, and Pierre Poilievre, the leader of the Conservatives, are using two distinct slogans – Canada Strong and Canada First – to present their vision for the country. In a time when external pressures (aka Trump tariffs and the “51st State” pitches) loom large over Canada’s future, Canada First vs Canada Strong is more than just a clash of phrases; it represents the larger political narratives each leader is trying to sell to Canadians. Canada Strong vs Canada First: A Clash of Phrases in a Changing Political Landscape  Carney quickly adopted Canada Strong as his rallying cry, unveiled at the leadership convention. It’s a message meant to evoke unity and strength, especially in the face of global uncertainty and the threat to Canada’s sovereignty. His videos and speeches highlight the need for a government that stands up for Canada and its people, focusing on resilience and collective prosperity. The slogan fits neatly into his larger narrative of standing firm in the face of challenges – something that many Canadians may find comforting, especially after the turbulence of recent years. Meanwhile, Poilievre is taking a much sharper approach with his Canada First mantra. His social media ads already feature bold statements like “Canada will bear any pain and pay any price to retain its sovereignty.” With tensions over tariffs, trade, and international relations on the rise, Poilievre’s message is clear: the focus should be on prioritizing Canada’s interests above all else. His ads tap into a growing sense of anxiety about the external threats facing the country, from the shifting global economy to rising geopolitical risks.   Will It be “Canada First” or “Canada Strong”? This political showdown is not just a matter of different parties trying to out-message each other. It’s a clash of worldviews at a critical time for Canada. With domestic issues like cost of living, affordability, and housing crisis taking a backseat to international concerns, these slogans speak to different aspects of what Canadians might need or want from their leaders. On the one hand, Carney’s Canada Strong is a message designed to reassure those who believe in the need for unity and national strength in uncertain times. But will that message resonate with voters if they feel more anxious about external threats than the need for unity? And how will Poilievre’s more direct, nationalistic Canada First approach sit with those who are tired of seeing Canada dragged into global conflicts? In an era where global politics is dominating national discourse, traditional political playbooks may not work as well. Voters are likely to be drawn to candidates who can show they will protect the country from external risks – whether that’s trade wars, environmental disasters, or geopolitical instability. Both leaders will need to convince Canadians that their approach will shield the country from the chaos unfolding around the world. A Battle for the Heart of Canada’s Identity This election is shaping up to be about more than just political promises; it’s about branding Canada’s identity at a critical moment. For Carney, Canada Strong suggests a kind of stability and resilience, a message of collective endurance. For Poilievre, Canada First is a declaration that the country’s sovereignty is paramount, that Canada must not be influenced by outside forces, and that the Canadian people must come first. Looking Ahead In the coming months, the battle between these two phrases – Canada First vs Canada Strong – will only intensify as each side crafts ads and messaging around their core slogan. But for now, Canadians are left to consider which of these messages resonates most with their own sense of identity and what they feel is at stake for the future of the country. As the political campaign heats up, it will be fascinating to see which vision for Canada captures the imagination of voters. Will it be the call for strength and unity in uncertain times or the insistence on putting Canada first at any cost? One thing is certain – this will be an election where the external world plays a far larger role in shaping voters’ decisions than the usual domestic concerns. Interested in staying updated with political marketing trends and insights in Canada? Don’t forget to check out our blog. Looking for some digital campaign advice from Canada’s leading political digital marketing agency? Get in touch! 

Pierre Poilievre's YouTube channel

Unpacking Pierre Poilievre’s YouTube Success and the Liberals’ Digital Deficit

Justin Trudeau’s resignation as Prime Minister and Liberal Party leader marks the end of an era in Canadian politics. While his departure opens the door to new leadership, it also leaves the Liberals at a crossroads. The next leader will face a daunting task: introducing themselves to millions of Canadians in a short period and rallying a fractured party for the 2025 election. Meanwhile, Pierre Poilievre and the Conservatives already have a powerful advantage: a dominant digital strategy centred on platforms like YouTube. This isn’t just about the Liberals finding a leader—it’s about catching up in a game the Conservatives have been winning for quite some time now. Why YouTube Matters in 2025?   YouTube’s importance in Canadian politics cannot be overstated. In a world where Meta’s ban on Canadian news has limited access to journalism on platforms like Facebook and Instagram, YouTube has emerged as the go-to space for unfiltered, direct communication. Canadians watch more YouTube than anyone else in the world, making it a critical platform for political engagement. Pierre Poilievre and his team recognized this early. Pierre Poilievre’s YouTube channel is a political powerhouse, with over 500,000 subscribers and more than 145 million views. In the last 30 days alone, his channel has garnered over 5 million views. Poilievre’s content strategy focuses on making complex issues accessible, using YouTube as a platform to amplify his narrative and mobilize his base. Whether or not the majority of viewers agree with his conclusions, his ability to connect with Canadians is undeniable. This digital grassroots approach has turned YouTube into more than a campaign tool for Poilievre—it’s a platform for shaping national conversations. His videos consistently attract millions of views, turning issues he prioritizes into topics of public debate. This level of influence presents a significant challenge for the Liberals’ incoming leader. The Liberals’ New Challenge For the Liberals, Trudeau’s departure adds urgency to their digital dilemma. The next leader will not only have to define themselves but also introduce their vision to a skeptical electorate in record time. Historically, the Liberals have relied on polished, top-down communication strategies. But in a digital-first world, where authenticity and relatability are prized, this approach risks falling flat. This contrast is most evident when comparing the parties’ presence on YouTube. Trudeau’s official channel has fewer than 40,000 subscribers and only about 2.5 million views—a fraction of Poilievre’s numbers. Before his resignation, the channel was attracting around 3,000 new followers monthly, compared to over 30,000 for Pierre Poilievre’s YouTube channel. While the Liberals have started to experiment with more relatable content, their efforts remain sporadic and lack the impact of Poilievre’s consistently strategic approach. The new leader will inherit a not-so-strong digital footprint that they will then have to expand and leverage. Digital Strategy: The Conservative Edge The Conservatives’ digital dominance extends beyond YouTube. According to Meta’s Ad Library, the CPC has consistently outspent the Liberals on social media advertising, often by staggering margins. In the fall of 2024, the Conservatives spent over $350,000 on Meta ads in a single month, while Liberal spending trailed far behind. This was on top of their record spending blitz in 2023. This disparity reflects not just a financial gap but also a strategic one. The Conservatives have embraced digital platforms as essential tools for voter outreach. Poilievre’s team has also mastered the art of creating shareable, engaging content that fosters a sense of community among supporters. His videos don’t just inform; they activate, encouraging viewers to participate in discussions and spread his message organically. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rnEj7WLsWbkhttps://youtu.be/vOB7-dbYuCc What’s Next? For the Liberals’ next leader, the stakes couldn’t be higher. The 2025 election will demand more than a charismatic presence or well-crafted policies—it will require a robust digital strategy that can compete with the Conservatives’ lead. The challenge is twofold: building a recognizable brand in record time and deploying a digital communication strategy that resonates with Canadians. This isn’t just about catching up to Pierre Poilievre’s YouTube numbers or outspending the Conservatives on Meta. It’s about understanding how to connect with voters in a fragmented media landscape where authenticity, accessibility, and engagement matter more than ever. As the Liberals navigate their post-Trudeau reality, they must confront a hard truth: their digital strategy is not just a weakness—it’s a liability. With Meta’s news ban shifting more Canadians to platforms like YouTube for information, the Liberals cannot afford to treat digital outreach as an afterthought. The 2025 election will test their ability to adapt to a rapidly changing political landscape. Pierre Poilievre and the Conservatives have shown what’s possible when digital tools are used effectively. For the Liberals, the path forward demands swift action, bold strategy, and a willingness to embrace digital innovation. One thing is clear: the road to Parliament Hill in 2025 starts online. The question is whether the Liberals can find their footing before it’s too late.

Facebook
X (Twitter)
LinkedIn